The following pictures show the second batch of 20-meter Cellular on Wheels shipped to the UAE. A total of six units were packed into three containers, secured with rope tensioners. The lifting towers were packed into two containers, for a total of five containers. Because the lifting towers are equipped with hydraulic systems, they were protected with foam and wood packaging.

The next day, the customer toured our Angle Steel Tower and Monopole Tower production lines and expressed praise for our production and processing capabilities. We also demonstrated our automated welding equipment for tower foot supports and inspected the weld quality. In addition, the customer visited the finished product packaging site and galvanizing workshop. Using a zinc meter, they measured the zinc coating thickness of each component, which averaged over 100 microns and met ASTM-A123 standards. The customer also observed our physical laboratory, which is used for quality inspections, and tested the tensile strength of Q355B steel.  

The photo shows representatives from Morocco's Netis Group visiting and inspecting our Cell on Wheels production line. The customer focused on the 30-meter Hydraulic Cell on Wheels and the 12-meter Emergency Telecom Cabinet and expressed initial interest in cooperation. We demonstrated the deployment and operation of both products on-site, and the customer expressed satisfaction with the speed and stability of the deployment. In addition, the customer and we had a detailed technical requirements discussion in the conference room, clarifying the specific requirements of the products required by the customer and the adaptability of our production capacity. Finally, we decided to provide the customer with a preliminary design and quotation to lay the foundation for future communication and cooperation.

The following images show a Qatari customer inspecting our Emergency Telecom Cabinet. Since there are no readily available export versions, we showcased a customized cabinet designed for the national emergency communications department. We provided a detailed introduction to the internal components, installation process, and deployment, and demonstrated the deployment process on-site.    

The review meeting invited Professor Wang Lijun, a national engineering survey and design master and chief expert of Huacheng Boyuan Engineering Technology Group Co., Ltd., as the group leader, and Professor Liu Yi, executive vice president of the association, Professor Huo Wenying, chief engineer of China Architecture Design & Research Group Co., Ltd., Professor Zheng Fang of Beijing Jiaotong University, Senior Engineer Huang Dada, chairman of Beijing Newman Di Lemon Membrane Building Technology Co., Ltd., Researcher Ma Ming, deputy chief engineer of China Academy of Building Research, and Senior Engineer Wang Wensheng, general manager of Meixin Lemon (Beijing) Membrane Building Technology Co., Ltd. as members. The meeting was chaired by Li Qingwei, Secretary General of the Association. Professor Xue Suduo, Professor Wu Jinzhi, Professor Li Xiongyan, and Professor Sun Guojun from the Beijing University of Technology from the standard drafting group, Li Zhongli, Chairman of Beijing Zhongtian Jiuye Membrane Building Technology Co., Ltd., Xiang Yang from Huacheng Boyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Wang Ping, Chairman of Beijing Jintengsheng Membrane Structure Technology Co., Ltd., Zhao Yu, Deputy General Manager of China Communications Construction Road Star (Beijing) Engineering Testing Technology Co., Ltd., Qu Xin, Executive Deputy General Manager of Beijing Jinshengjie Membrane Structure Technology Co., Ltd., Hu Botian, General Manager of Zhongti Shenghua (Beijing) Membrane Building Technology Co., Ltd., Hu Qingwei, General Manager of Beijing Shengtao Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Liu Gang, Deputy General Manager of Beijing Texlon Membrane Technology Co., Ltd., and other drafting experts and other personnel attended the meeting. At the review meeting, Professor Li Xiongyan of Beijing University of Technology reported on the background, technical content, and public opinion solicitation for the standard. The expert review panel carefully and meticulously reviewed the "Membrane Structure Processing and Manufacturing Standard" chapter by chapter and article by article, offering revisions and suggestions. Members of the standard drafting team responded to questions raised by the expert panel. After discussion, the review expert group believed that the standard was comprehensive in content, with reasonable main technical indicators, and was advanced, innovative and practical. They unanimously agreed to pass the review of the draft of the "Membrane Structure Processing and Manufacturing Standard".